简介:手法小切口白内障术(manualsmallincisioncataractsurgepy,MSICS)特别是在发展中国家已广泛应用于临床手术。本文旨在比较传统白内障囊外摘除术(extracapsularcataractextraction,ECCE)、MSICS以及超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗效果以及安全性(术中并发症以及术后并发症)。通过使用PubMed搜索引擎,我们收集了传统ECCE、MSICS以及超声乳化白内障吸除术的相关文献,以评价其安全性和治疗效果。同时,也参考了国内出版的相关文献。结果发现,与超声乳化白内障吸除术相比,传统ECCE以及MSICS也取得了很好的治疗效果,并且具有并发症少等优点。MSICS不需要依赖昂贵的仪器,并且具有手术快速、费用低廉以及技术门槛低等特点,特别适用于硬核白内障的治疗。虽然在白内障手术治疗过程中MSICS需要一定的技术和耐心,但它仍然是一种安全、有效、经济治疗手段,特别是在发展中国家可以替代超声乳化进行白内障的治疗。
简介:目的评价庆大霉素双氯芬酸钠控制白内障和青光眼术后炎症反应的疗效和安全性。方法采用临床多中心、随机、双盲、对照试验。试验组和对照组分别滴用庆大霉素双氯芬酸钠和复美新,每日4次,观察2wk。结果内眼术后试验组和对照组中有效率分别是71.43%和65.52%,两者间的差异无统计学意义。两组的不良事件发生率也无统计学意义。结论庆大霉素双氯芬酸钠是控制内眼术后(白内障手术和青光眼手术)有效和安全的药物。(中国眼耳鼻喉科杂志,2006,6:223~225)
简介:AIM:Toadaptthelowvision-relatedqualityoflife(LVQOL)instrumentintoTurkishlanguageandtoassessitsvalidityandreliability.METHODS:Thestudywasconductedin387patientsattendingtheCentreofLowVisionRehabilitation,FacultyofMedicine,AnkaraUniversity.Forstatisticalanalyses,theSpearman’scorrelationcoefficient,Cronbach’salphacoefficientandConfirmatoryFactorAnalysis(CFA)wereused.RESULTS:AccordingtoresultsofCFA,theiteminthe'Adjustment'subscalebecauseofhavingthefactorloadingbelow0.40,wasexcludedfromthequestionnaire.ThereliabilityofthequestionnairewasassessedaccordingtoCronbach’salphacoefficients.Thereliabilityofthe'DistanceVision,Mobility,andLighting'subscalewas?琢=0.863;ofthe'Adjustment'subscalewas?琢=0.694;'ReadingandFineWork'was?琢=0.791,and'ActivitiesofDailyLiving'was?琢=0.770.Sotheseresultsindicatethatthequestionnaireisreliabletomeasurethevisionrelatedqualityoflifeoflow-visionpatients.Thecorrelationsbetweenthesubscaleswerealsoanalyzed,andthecorrelationbetween'Adjustment'and'ReadingandFineWork'wasfoundtobethelowest(rs=0.336,P<0.001),whereasthestrongestcorrelationwasfoundbetweenthe'ReadingandFineWork',and'ActivitiesofDailyLiving'.Additionally,the'Adjustment'dimensionshowedthestrongestcorrelationwithonly'DistanceVision,Mobility,andLighting'dimension.CONCLUSION:Afterremovingthelastitemintheseconddimension,theTurkishadaptationofalldimensionsoftheLVQOLhasbeenshowntobereliable,validandsuitableforuseinpatientswithlowvisioninTurkey.
简介:AIM:Tocomparetheeffectoftopicallyadministeredandsubconjunctivallyinjectedbevacizumabonexperimentalcornealneovascularizationinratsfortwoweeksaftertreatment.METHODS:Twenty-eightSprague-Dawleyratsweredividedintofourgroupsof7animals.Eachcornealcenterofrighteyewascauterizedwithsilver/potassiumnitratefor8s.Aftercornealburning,bevacizumab(12.5mg/mL)wastopicallyadministeredthreetimesperday(TBgroup)fortwoweeksorsubconjunctivallyinjectedondays2and4aftercauterization(0.02mL;SBgroup).Asnegativecontrols,ratsreceived0.9%salinetopicallythreetimesperday(TSgroup)orsubconjunctivallyondays2and4(0.02mL;SSgroup).Digitalphotographsofthecorneaweretaken1and2weeksaftertreatmentandanalyzedtodeterminetheareaofcorneacoveredbyneovascularizationasthepercentageofcornealneovascularization.RESULTS:Oneweekaftertreatment,thepercentageofcornealneovascularizationwassignificantlylowerintheTBandSBgroupsthanintheTSandSSgroups(allP<0.05).Twoweeksaftertreatment,thepercentageofcornealneovascularizationwassignificantlylowerintheTBgroupthanintheTSgroup(P<0.05).Inallgroups,thepercentageofneovascularizationwasdecreasingastimepassed(allP<0.05)CONCLUSION:Topicallyadministeredbevacizumabhaslongerstandinganti-angiogeniceffectthansubconjunctivallyinjectedbevacizumabincornealneovascularizationfollowingchemicalinjuryinrats.
简介:目的:系统评价拉坦前列素(Latanoprost)滴眼液与噻吗心安(Timolol)滴眼液降眼压的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed,Medline,CNKI及中国生物医学文献数据库收录的,并辅以手工检索、因特网搜索的有关拉坦前列素与噻吗心安治疗原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症的随机对照试验(RCT)。按照纳入和排除标准限定研究对象,通过Jadad评分量表进行文献质量评估后,针对眼压下降比例、药物不良反应2项内容,使用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入9项RCT,合计555例患者。Meta分析结果显示:(1)拉坦前列素滴眼液与噻吗心安滴眼液降眼压效果,在2,6,12wk时差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),加权平均差(WMD)分别为:在2wk[WMD=-0.76,95%CI(-1.32,-0.20)],在6wk[WMD=-1.15,95%CI(-1.68,0.63)]和12wk[WMD=-1.01,95%CI(-1.42,-0.61)]。(2)随访结束时,结膜充血、异物感为拉坦前列素的两种较为常见的不良反应,但其发生率拉坦前列素组与噻吗心安组比较,结膜充血的发生率[OR=2.25,95%CI(0.99,5.08)],异物感的发生率[OR=2.48,95%CI(1.02,6.03)],显示二者差异均无统计学意义。结论:治疗原发性开角型青光眼和高眼压症,拉坦前列素降眼压效果在用药12wk内较噻吗心安好;两者在12wk内引起结膜充血、异物感、虹膜色素加深、视野损害等的不良反应方面,差异不明显。由于纳入研究的样本量偏小,且方法学质量中等,致使本系统评价结果论证强度不高,因此还需要开展更多的高质量的临床随机对照研究,以便更客观、准确、全面地评价其疗效和安全性。
简介:目的:使用Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪比较高度近视眼与正常人(正视眼)中央前房深度(centralanteriorchamberdepth,CACD)和前房角(anteriorchamberangle,ACA)两项前房参数差异,进一步了解高度近视眼的解剖学特点。方法:收集2010-10/2011-06在我院门诊就诊的正视眼82例,收集同期我院门诊与准分子激光中心就诊的高度近视眼68例,采用Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪测量CACD和ACA。对高度近视组与正视眼组的前房参数值进行两样本t检验,比较两组间参数有无差异。结果:Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪测得正常人CACD平均值为3.02±0.47mm,ACA平均值为33.26°±6.20°。高度近视眼的CACD平均值为3.24±0.38mm,ACA的平均值为39.55°±6.68°。高度近视眼与正视眼的两项前房参数值均存在显著性差异(均P〈0.05)。结论:Pentacam三维眼前段分析仪测量前房参数,高度近视眼与正视眼相比中央前房深度深、前房角宽。