简介：公私合作治理模式作为一种前瞻性和创新性的治理方式,是国家治理从消极义务向积极义务的螺旋式升级的体现,特别是在智能社会治理中尤为体现其治理优势.文章以智能社会治理中较为突出的个人信息保护领域为重点讨论公私合作共治的法律问题.公私合作治理以行政委托、协商制定行政规则以及公私合作规制的方式促进公权力和私权力的深度合作,符合个人信息保护的效益原则.然而,在明确引入合作治理机制后,有必要厘清可能存在的法律风险,防止造成行政法向私法逃遁、引发私权力的滥用及腐败、隐私政策的效力不清以及对第三方机构的监管不完善等问题.对于公私合作治理模式下的个人信息保护,还应关注私权力集中的平台责任以及国家担保责任的机制嬗变,为公私合作治理模式在个人信息保护上发挥作用扫清障碍.Abstract：As a forward-looking and innovative governance mode,the public-private partnership governance mode is the embodiment of the spiral upgrading of national governance from negative obligation to positive obligation,espe-cially in its governance advantages in the intelligent social governance.This paper focuses on the prominent field of personal information protection and discusses the legal issues of public-private partnership co-governance.Public-private partnership governance promotes the deep cooperation between public power and private power in the way of administrative entrustment,negotiated formulation of administrative rules and public-private partnership regulation,which is in line with t...

简介：围绕数据权益保护,有权利保护模式和行为规制模式之分.但两种模式是否截然二分,以反不正当竞争法为代表的行为规制模式是否存在数据赋权的可能性,都值得再思考.司法实践中,竞争关系认定已经趋于泛化,其不适宜再被定位为实体要件或起诉条件.对不正当竞争行为的判定重心应由"竞争关系"转向"竞争秩序",由此竞争法上数据权益便获得了一定程度的对世性.权利和利益的分野并不在其采取的保护模式,而在其是否契合权益区分的法教义学标准.只要归属效能和排除效能清晰到获得社会典型公开性的程度,行为规制模式亦可实现权利化.鉴于当今司法实践主要通过反不正当竞争法保护数据权益,凝聚两种模式的共识,以行为规制权利化路径落地数据产权结构性分置,或许是为一条可行路径.Abstract：In the realm of protecting data rights and interests,there is a distinction between the pattern of rights protec-tion and the pattern of behavior regulation.However,it is worth reconsidering whether these two patterns are strictly di-chotomous and whether the pattern of behavior regulation,as represented by the Anti-Unfair Competition Law,holds the potential for data empowerment.In judicial practice,the determination of competitive relationship has become so generalized that it is no longer suitable as a substantive requirement or a condition for litigation.The determination of unfair competition should shift its focus from"competitive relationship"to"competitive order",thereby granting data rights and ...

简介：摘要：在当前经济全球化和技术迅猛发展的背景下，组织变革成为企业适应市场和提升竞争力的必然选择。在当今高度竞争的社会背景下，高校作为人才培养的重要阵地，人力资源管理和创新能力的有效融合已成为高校保持竞争力和适应社会发展变革的关键。高校人力资源管理不仅仅是对教师和员工的管理，更是一种战略性的举措。本文着重探讨了人力资源在组织变革中的关键作用，分析了有效的人力资源策略，并讨论了这些策略在实践中的应用。

简介：医疗机构数据合规是数字社会的外生产物,也是维系和平衡数据保护与数据共享、个人利益与公共利益之间关系的重要途径,对于健康中国战略的实施具有重大现实意义.实践中,医疗机构数据囊括了诊疗前收集的个人身份识别数据、诊疗中产生的临床医疗数据、公共卫生管理中收集的医疗数据、日常生活中产生的潜在医疗数据等主要样态.在全面推进中国式现代化的新征程上,应明晰从个人本位向社会本位的价值转向,凸显信赖理念的补强作用,以数据利用的最小化原则为指南,着眼于后疫情时代医疗机构数据的新发展和新变化.与此同时,通过履行告知同意义务、明确数据收集和使用范围、强化相关技术措施的规范使用、健全数据合规法律责任体系等一系列举措,建构出一套灵活且高效的医疗机构数据合规体系.Abstract：Medical institution data compliance is an exogenous product of the digital society,serving as a crucial means to maintain and balance the relationship between data protection and data sharing,as well as individual inter-ests and public interests.The implementation of the Healthy China Initiative greatly benefits from its practical signifi-cance.In practice,data from medical institutions takes varied forms,including personally identifiable data collected before diagnosis and treatment,clinical medical data generated during diagnosis and treatment,medical data collected in public health management,and potential medical data generated in daily life.In the new journey of comprehensively promoting the Chinese pat...

简介：如何在监管人工智能风险与支持人工智能创新之间寻求平衡点,已经成为人工智能治理的核心问题.为缓和监管和创新的紧张关系,各国监管机构逐渐将发端于金融领域的监管沙盒应用于人工智能治理中.人工智能监管沙盒不仅有助于控制技术风险,还避免扼杀人工智能创新,为我国人工智能治理开辟一条具有可行性的新路径.它为尚未投入市场的新型人工智能提供了进行开发和试验的可控环境,在监管机构可控范围内为创新者保留了必要的试错容错空间.相较于传统自上而下的硬性监管、事后监管和严格监管方式,监管沙盒以敏捷与包容审慎的理念对人工智能进行全周期的治理.但其也具有固有局限性并且在运行中可能会遇到实践障碍,需要更合理的制度加以克服.我国人工智能监管沙盒制度应当构建与完善准入与退出机制、沙盒与个人信息保护的协调机制,以及豁免、披露和沟通交流等机制,...Abstract：The main challenge in AI governance today is striking a balance between controlling AI dangers and foster-ing AI innovation.Regulators in a number of nations have progressively extended the regulatory sandbox,which was first implemented in the banking sector,to AI governance in an effort to reduce the conflict between regulation and in-novation.The AI regulatory sandbox is a new and feasible route for AI governance in China that not only helps to man-age the risks of technology application but also prevents inhibiting AI innovation.It keeps inventors'trial-and-error tolerance space inside the regulatory purview while offering a controlled setting for the development and testing of novel AI that hasn't yet bee

简介：赋权规制与公共领域规制作为现有对人工智能生成内容保护的规制逻辑,前者面临"独创性"认定标准不一、权利主体及内容不明等争议;后者虽能满足公共性使用的需求,但存在激励机制缺失、公共性资源滥用等问题,难以有效维护各方利益.相比之下,采取行为规制逻辑,不仅能够有效促进公共利益目标的实现、凝聚社会成员公共性使用的"普遍性共识",还能有效实现对产业发展的合理激励与利益平衡,在推动技术创新的同时兼顾利益的分配公平.关于人工智能生成内容保护的行为规制路径建构,应当通过厘清人工智能生成内容所蕴含的市场性利益、营业性利益以及公共性利益三重保护利益,并基于利益指向实现人工智能生成内容的动态保护,以此为技术演变与产业发展提供更加灵活的空间,实现科技与法律关系的良性互动与逻辑自洽.Abstract：Empowerment regulation and public domain regulation are the existing regulatory logics for AI-generated content protection,but the former is faced with controversies such as different criteria for the determination of"original-ity",uncertainty of the subject of the right and its content;although the latter can meet the demand for public use,there are problems such as lack of incentives and misuse of public resources,which makes it difficult to effectively pro-tect the interests of all parties.In contrast,adopting the logic of behavioural regulation can not only effectively promote the realization of the public interest goal and gather the"general consensus"of the public use of the members of the so-ciety;it can also...

简介：摘要：思想政治工作与社会主义核心价值观建设是紧密相连的，它们共同构成了中国社会主义精神文明建设的核心内容。社会主义核心价值观是中国特色社会主义的根本价值追求和指导思想，是当代中国社会主义政治文化建设的重要组成部分。思想政治工作作为社会主义核心价值体系得以深入推广和持久传承的重要途径，肩负着培养社会主义核心价值观的重要任务。本文探讨简要探讨了思想政治工作与社会主义核心价值观建设的关系及其重要性。