简介：【摘要】目的 探讨中西医结合护理在乳腺癌患者术后放疗中的应用效果。方法 随机抽选本院接收的68例乳腺手术后放疗患者，选取时间为2019年5月-2020年5月，依据随机数字表法分为对照组（34例，常规护理）与观察组（34例，中西医结合护理），对两组不良反应发生率进行对比。结果 不良反应发生率方面，对照组是41.18%，观察组是14.71%，观察组更低，与对照组存在明显差异（P

简介：　　【摘要】目的 研究支气管扩张咯血患者护理过程中实施心理护理的方法及效果。方法 选取我院 2018年 2月～ 2019年 2月收治的 100例支气管扩张咯血患者为研究对象，分为两组，给予对照组患者常规护理，在对照组护理基础上给予观察组患者心理护理，对比两组护理效果。结果 护理后，观察组患者的 SDS与 SAS评分显著低于对照组。结论 支气管扩张咯血患者护理过程中实施心理护理的效果显著，值得广  　　泛推广。  　　【关键词】支气管扩张咯血；心理护理；效果  　 [Abstract] Objective To study the method and effect of psychological nursing in patients with bronchiectasis and hemoptysis. Methods 100 cases of bronchiectasis hemoptysis patients in our hospital from February 2018 to February 2019 were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into two groups. The control group was given routine nursing, and the observation group was given psychological nursing on the basis of the control group. The nursing effect of the two groups was compared. Results after nursing, the SDS and SAS scores of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group. Conclusion the effect of psychological nursing in the nursing process of patients with bronchiectasis hemoptysis is significant, which is worth popularizing

简介：　　【摘 要】 目的：探讨联合应用预见性护理与优质护理对肺栓塞或高危肺栓塞患者的干预效果。方法：随机选取我院于 2016年 7月至 2019年 7月间接收的 82例肺栓塞及高危肺栓塞患者，并将其均分为常规组（ n=41）与联合组（ n=41）。其中对常规组患者采取常规护理干预，对联合组患者则联合应用预见性护理与优质护理干预，将两组护理效果做评价比较。结果：联合组患者不良反应发生率低于常规组，且前者各项生命体征指标更佳，差异有统计学意义（ P<0.05） ;结论：联合应用预见性护理与优质护理对肺栓塞或高危肺栓塞具有重要的临床意义，可显著提升护理服务质量，值得推广应用。  　　【关键词】 预见性护理：优质护理：肺栓塞：高危因素  　 [Abstract] Objective: To explore the intervention effect of combined application of predictive nursing and high-quality nursing on patients with pulmonary embolism or high-risk pulmonary embolism. Methods: 82 patients with pulmonary embolism and high-risk pulmonary embolism in our hospital from July 2016 to July 2019 were randomly selected and divided into conventional group (n = 41) and combination group (n = 41). Among them, routine nursing intervention was adopted for patients in the conventional group, while predictive nursing and high-quality nursing intervention were combined in the combined group. The nursing effect of the two groups was evaluated and compared. Results: the incidence of adverse reactions in the combined group was lower than that in the conventional group, and the vital signs of the former were better than those in the conventional group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: the combined application of predictive nursing and high-quality nursing has important clinical significance for pulmonary embolism or high-risk pulmonary embolism, which can significantly improve the quality of nursing service, and is worthy of promotion and application.