简介：　　摘要：目的：分析老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿护理中舒适护理的应用效果。方法：以本院 2016年 9月～ 2018年 9月间治疗的 40例老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者作为研究对象，借助双盲随机抽样法分为对照、观察组，每组列入 20例，对照组实施传统护理干预，观察组实施舒适护理干预，对比 2组护理满意度、生活质量评分、舒适度。结果：治疗前， 2组患者的生活质量改善程度无显著差异， P>0.05;治疗后，观察组相较于对照组患者的生活質量评分升高， P<0.05;观察组（ 98.18%）相较于对照组护理满意度（ 85.45%）较高，观察组相较于对照组舒适度显著提升， P<0.05。结论：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者实施舒适护理干预具有积极意义，可显著提升患者的护理满意度，改善生活质量及舒适度，值得临床推广与采纳。  　　关键词：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿 ;舒适护理 ;应用效果  　 Abstract: Objective: to analyze the application effect of comfortable nursing in the nursing of senile chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema. Methods: 40 elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema who were treated in our hospital from September 2016 to September 2018 were divided into control group and observation group by double blind random sampling method. Each group was included in 20 cases. Traditional nursing intervention was carried out in the control group and comfortable nursing intervention was carried out in the observation group. Nursing satisfaction, quality of life score and comfort degree were compared in the two groups. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference in the improvement of quality of life between the two groups (P > 0.05); after treatment, the quality of life score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05); the nursing satisfaction of the observation group (98.18%) was higher than that of the control group (85.45%), and the comfort of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: comfort nursing intervention in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema is of positive significance, which can significantly improve the nursing satisfaction of patients, improve the quality of life and comfort, and is worthy of clinical promotion and adoption.

简介：　　摘要：目的：分析老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿护理中舒适护理的应用效果。方法：以本院 2016年 9月～ 2018年 9月间治疗的 40例老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者作为研究对象，借助双盲随机抽样法分为对照、观察组，每组列入 20例，对照组实施传统护理干预，观察组实施舒适护理干预，对比 2组护理满意度、生活质量评分、舒适度。结果：治疗前， 2组患者的生活质量改善程度无显著差异， P>0.05;治疗后，观察组相较于对照组患者的生活質量评分升高， P<0.05;观察组（ 98.18%）相较于对照组护理满意度（ 85.45%）较高，观察组相较于对照组舒适度显著提升， P<0.05。结论：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者实施舒适护理干预具有积极意义，可显著提升患者的护理满意度，改善生活质量及舒适度，值得临床推广与采纳。  　　关键词：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿 ;舒适护理 ;应用效果  　 Abstract: Objective: to analyze the application effect of comfortable nursing in the nursing of senile chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema. Methods: 40 elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema who were treated in our hospital from September 2016 to September 2018 were divided into control group and observation group by double blind random sampling method. Each group was included in 20 cases. Traditional nursing intervention was carried out in the control group and comfortable nursing intervention was carried out in the observation group. Nursing satisfaction, quality of life score and comfort degree were compared in the two groups. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference in the improvement of quality of life between the two groups (P > 0.05); after treatment, the quality of life score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05); the nursing satisfaction of the observation group (98.18%) was higher than that of the control group (85.45%), and the comfort of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: comfort nursing intervention in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema is of positive significance, which can significantly improve the nursing satisfaction of patients, improve the quality of life and comfort, and is worthy of clinical promotion and adoption.

简介：　　摘要：目的：分析老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿护理中舒适护理的应用效果。方法：以本院 2016年 9月～ 2018年 9月间治疗的 40例老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者作为研究对象，借助双盲随机抽样法分为对照、观察组，每组列入 20例，对照组实施传统护理干预，观察组实施舒适护理干预，对比 2组护理满意度、生活质量评分、舒适度。结果：治疗前， 2组患者的生活质量改善程度无显著差异， P>0.05;治疗后，观察组相较于对照组患者的生活質量评分升高， P<0.05;观察组（ 98.18%）相较于对照组护理满意度（ 85.45%）较高，观察组相较于对照组舒适度显著提升， P<0.05。结论：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿患者实施舒适护理干预具有积极意义，可显著提升患者的护理满意度，改善生活质量及舒适度，值得临床推广与采纳。  　　关键词：老年慢性阻塞性肺气肿 ;舒适护理 ;应用效果  　 Abstract: Objective: to analyze the application effect of comfortable nursing in the nursing of senile chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema. Methods: 40 elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema who were treated in our hospital from September 2016 to September 2018 were divided into control group and observation group by double blind random sampling method. Each group was included in 20 cases. Traditional nursing intervention was carried out in the control group and comfortable nursing intervention was carried out in the observation group. Nursing satisfaction, quality of life score and comfort degree were compared in the two groups. Results: before treatment, there was no significant difference in the improvement of quality of life between the two groups (P > 0.05); after treatment, the quality of life score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05); the nursing satisfaction of the observation group (98.18%) was higher than that of the control group (85.45%), and the comfort of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: comfort nursing intervention in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary emphysema is of positive significance, which can significantly improve the nursing satisfaction of patients, improve the quality of life and comfort, and is worthy of clinical promotion and adoption.

简介：　　 [摘要 ] 目的：探讨比较不同护理模式在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果。方法：选取 2015年 12月～ 2017年 11月于本院进行治疗的 66例短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者为研究对象，将其随机分为 A组（常规护理组）和 B组（人性化护理组），每组各 33例，将两组患者护理前后的汉密顿焦虑量表（ HAMA）、汉密顿抑郁量表（ HAMD）、发作频率、发作时间及患者满意率、治疗依从性进行统计及比较。结果：护理后， B组的 HAMA[（ 3.5±1.3）分 ]、 HAMD[（ 3.6±1.5）分 ]评分优于 A组 [（ 6.4±1.8）、（ 6.5±1.5）分 ]（ t=6.852、 7.145， P＜ 0.05），发作频率 [（ 1.7±0.8）次 /月 ]低于 A组 [（ 3.2±1.5）次 /月 ]（ t=6.589， P＜ 0.05），发作时间 [（ 5.0±1.5） min]短于 A组 [（ 7.2±1.8） min]（ t=8.145， P＜ 0.05）。 B组患者治疗依从性（ 93.94%）好于 A组（ 78.79%）（ χ2=6.471， P＜ 0.05），患者满意率（ 100.00%）高于 A组（ 87.88%）（ χ2=7.125， P＜ 0.05）。结论：人性化护理在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果较好，优于常规护理模式。  　　 [关键词 ] 人性化护理；常规护理；短暂性脑缺血反复发作；护理效果  　 [abstract] Objective: To explore and compare the nursing effects of different nursing modes in patients with recurrent transient cerebral ischemia. Methods: 66 patients with recurrent transient cerebral ischemia treated in our hospital from December 2015 to November 2017 were randomly divided into group A (routine nursing group) and group B (humanized nursing group), 33 cases in each group. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), seizure frequency, seizure time and duration before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. The satisfaction rate and treatment compliance were compared. Results: After nursing care, the HAMA [(3.5 +1.3 score], HAMD [(3.5 +1.3 score], HAMD [(3.6 +1.5 score]] score in group B was better than that in group A [(6.4 +1.8), (6.5 +1.8 score] (t = 6.852, 7.145, P < 0.05), t = 6.852, 7 [(1.7 +0.8) times/month] and frequency [(1.7 [(1.7 ((1.7 +0.8) times/month] (t [(3.2 +1.5 1.5) times/month] (t = 6.589, P < 0 7.2 + 1.8 min] (t = 8.145, P < 0.05). The treatment compliance of group B (93.94%) was better than that of group A (78.79%) (2 = 6.471, P < 0.05), and the satisfaction rate of patients (100.00%) was higher than that of group A (87.88%) (2 = 7.125, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Humanized nursing has a better effect in patients with recurrent transient cerebral ischemia than conventional nursing mode.