简介：公私合作治理模式作为一种前瞻性和创新性的治理方式,是国家治理从消极义务向积极义务的螺旋式升级的体现,特别是在智能社会治理中尤为体现其治理优势.文章以智能社会治理中较为突出的个人信息保护领域为重点讨论公私合作共治的法律问题.公私合作治理以行政委托、协商制定行政规则以及公私合作规制的方式促进公权力和私权力的深度合作,符合个人信息保护的效益原则.然而,在明确引入合作治理机制后,有必要厘清可能存在的法律风险,防止造成行政法向私法逃遁、引发私权力的滥用及腐败、隐私政策的效力不清以及对第三方机构的监管不完善等问题.对于公私合作治理模式下的个人信息保护,还应关注私权力集中的平台责任以及国家担保责任的机制嬗变,为公私合作治理模式在个人信息保护上发挥作用扫清障碍.Abstract：As a forward-looking and innovative governance mode,the public-private partnership governance mode is the embodiment of the spiral upgrading of national governance from negative obligation to positive obligation,espe-cially in its governance advantages in the intelligent social governance.This paper focuses on the prominent field of personal information protection and discusses the legal issues of public-private partnership co-governance.Public-private partnership governance promotes the deep cooperation between public power and private power in the way of administrative entrustment,negotiated formulation of administrative rules and public-private partnership regulation,which is in line with t...

简介：赋权规制与公共领域规制作为现有对人工智能生成内容保护的规制逻辑,前者面临"独创性"认定标准不一、权利主体及内容不明等争议;后者虽能满足公共性使用的需求,但存在激励机制缺失、公共性资源滥用等问题,难以有效维护各方利益.相比之下,采取行为规制逻辑,不仅能够有效促进公共利益目标的实现、凝聚社会成员公共性使用的"普遍性共识",还能有效实现对产业发展的合理激励与利益平衡,在推动技术创新的同时兼顾利益的分配公平.关于人工智能生成内容保护的行为规制路径建构,应当通过厘清人工智能生成内容所蕴含的市场性利益、营业性利益以及公共性利益三重保护利益,并基于利益指向实现人工智能生成内容的动态保护,以此为技术演变与产业发展提供更加灵活的空间,实现科技与法律关系的良性互动与逻辑自洽.Abstract：Empowerment regulation and public domain regulation are the existing regulatory logics for AI-generated content protection,but the former is faced with controversies such as different criteria for the determination of"original-ity",uncertainty of the subject of the right and its content;although the latter can meet the demand for public use,there are problems such as lack of incentives and misuse of public resources,which makes it difficult to effectively pro-tect the interests of all parties.In contrast,adopting the logic of behavioural regulation can not only effectively promote the realization of the public interest goal and gather the"general consensus"of the public use of the members of the so-ciety;it can also...

简介：数字经济时代反垄断面临的挑战需要探究新的应对策略.面对反垄断文本模糊引致规范准确适用难题、文本竞合造成规范选择适用障碍的双重挑战,"规范保护目的论"因其发展轨迹及外在功能,可为解决数字经济时代反垄断的挑战提供有益借鉴.出于尊重差异、预防滥用的考量,"规范保护目的论"适用于反垄断领域应遵循类型化的基本要求.依循数字经济时代垄断纠纷与反垄断法律规范文本之间的关系,可得出数字经济时代反垄断领域"规范保护目的论"的三种场景化适用路径:文本明确时补强适用、文本模糊时解释适用、文本竞合时选择适用.Abstract：The challenges facing anti-monopoly in the era of digital economy require the exploration of new coping strategies.In the face of the dual challenges of accurate application of norms due to the ambiguity of anti-monopoly texts and the obstacle of selective application of norms due to textual competition,"the theory of normative protection purposes",due to its developmental trajectory and extrinsic functions,can provide useful reference for solving the chal-lenges of anti-monopoly in the digital economy era.In order to respect differences and prevent abuses,the application of"the theory of normative protection purposes",to the anti-monopoly field should follow the basic requirement of ty-pology.Followi