浅析骨折复位外固定器治疗下肢复杂性骨折对骨折愈合及不良反应的影响

在线阅读 下载PDF 导出详情
摘要   【摘要】 目的 研究分析采用骨折复位外固定器对下肢复杂性骨折的治疗效果及不良反应情况。方法 此次研究的对象是选择 2015年 7月~ 2017年 8月 100例下肢复杂性骨折患者,将其临床资料进行回顾性分析,并随机分为治疗组和对照组, 各 50例。治疗组采用骨折复位外固定器治疗, 对照组采用 AO钢板固定治疗。比较并分析两组患者骨折愈合以及不良反应情况。结果 治疗组中 38例愈合优秀, 8例愈合良好, 4例愈合较差, 有效率为 92.0%;对照组中 19例愈合优秀, 20例愈合良好, 11例愈合较差, 有效率为 78.0%, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。同时, 治疗组中 2例患者出现不良反应, 而对照组中则有 8例患者出现不良反应, 两组比较差异具有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论 对于治疗下肢复杂性骨折这类疾病时, 采用骨折复位外固定器进行治疗, 能够取得较为理想的治疗效果, 建议临床外科中广泛应用并加以改进。    【关键词】 骨折复位外固定器;下肢复杂性骨折;骨折愈合;不良反应  Objective to study and analyze the efficacy and side effects of fracture reduction external fixator in the treatment of complex fractures of the lower extremities. Methods 100 cases of complex fractures of the lower extremities were selected from July 2015 to August 2017. The clinical data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively, and were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group, each with 50 cases. The treatment group was treated with fracture reduction and external fixator, while the control group was treated with AO plate fixation. The fracture healing and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results in the treatment group, 38 cases healed well, 8 cases healed well, 4 cases had poor healing and the effective rate was 92%. 19 cases in the control group were excellent in healing, 20 cases healed well, 11 cases were poor and the effective rate was 78%. The difference of two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). At the same time, 2 patients in the treatment group had adverse reactions, while 8 cases in the control group had adverse reactions, and the two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion for the treatment of complex fracture of lower extremities, the treatment of fracture reduction external fixator can achieve more ideal therapeutic effect. It is recommended to be widely used and improved in clinical surgery.
出处 《系统医学》 2018年07期
关键词
出版日期 2019年12月17日(中国期刊网平台首次上网日期,不代表论文的发表时间)