首页 > 《美中法律评论：英文版》 > 2014年12期 > THE PROCEDURE OF PLEA BARGAINING IN ROMANIA A NEGOTIATION OR JUST A FORMAL INSTITUTION？ THE COMMON LAW SYSTEM

THE PROCEDURE OF PLEA BARGAINING IN ROMANIA A NEGOTIATION OR JUST A FORMAL INSTITUTION？ THE COMMON LAW SYSTEM

在线阅读下载PDF 导出详情

摘要未填写

DOI 54k637k3jk/1463433

作者 Versavia Brutaru

机构地区不详

出处《美中法律评论：英文版》 2014年12期

关键词罗马尼亚程序证明交易法律效力谈判法制

分类 [政治法律][法学理论]

出版日期 2014年12月22日（中国期刊网平台首次上网日期，不代表论文的发表时间）

相关文献

1Marian Enache. TRANSPOSITION OF EU LAW IN ROMANIA-- PRINCIPLES OF EU LAW AND ROMANIAN EXPERIENCES.法学理论,2013-03.
2Csaba Fenyvesi. THE CONTINENTAL AND COMMON-LAW CONCEPTIONS OF CRIMINALISTICS.法学理论,2017-01.
3Thomas Straub;Georges A. Cavalier. Comparing civil law and common law systems for mergers and acquisitions An economic analysis.法学理论,2010-02.
4Lei CAO. Explicit Reciprocity Law for Lubin-Tate Formal Groups.基础数学,2006-05.
5James G. Ogg;Brad Pillans. Establishing Quaternary as a formal internationa Period/System.地质学,2008-02.
6王宏远. Anti-Secession Law^1 Reflects Common Will.英语,2005-02.
7Sven Günther. ROMAN LAW: OPENING THE SYSTEM.历史学,2018-02.
8Celina Tri Siwi Kristiyanti. FIDUCIARY SECURITY LAW IN COLLATERAL MATERIAL LAW SYSTEM IN INDONESIA.法学理论,2014-08.
9Hnin Pwint Aye;Yoshiteru Nakamori. CONSTRUCTING AN ACCESS SYSTEM FOR UNBANKED IN MYANMAR TO A MICROFINANCE INSTITUTION.系统科学,2015-02.
10Leonardo J Raznovich. MEANS OF PROOF IN COMMON AND CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS： A COMPARATIVE APPROACH.法学理论,2011-07.

来源期刊

美中法律评论：英文版

相关推荐

同分类资源更多

相关关键词

罗马尼亚程序证明交易法律效力谈判法制

返回顶部